Sure, the Al Qaeda in Iraq sent the bombers. Does it matter that they were sent from IRaq and not Afghanistan? I would say that the invasion of Afghanistan destabilized the middle east, by forcing Al Qaeda to find new digs-- but that doesn't sit well with those who accept the invasion of Afghanistan as a reasonable response to the most recent attack on US soil.
I'd say the point is to be preventitive more than punitary...
and it seems like we would have had a pretty good shot at containing Afghanistan. Iraq was a much larger enterprise, and inherently more "leaky". I wasn't for the Afghanistan invasion at first but now it doesn't seem like taking out the government acting as their HQ was such a bad idea.
It was never a bad idea. Frankly, it wasn't a bad idea before they attacked on 9/11, or the USS Cole, or the base in Saudi Arabia, or the WTC in 1993. And that's just the attacks against Americans.
This is a great site, cool...
Thanks for people who create thit site. More cool information, more articles. Great!!!
good luck...
see my site :-)
http://asic.enosi.org/index.html
http://asic.enosi.org/map.html
Damn, another spammer.
Well, one lone spam ain't a big deal, we'll see what any friends look like and then start exterminatin'