I like the card readers because they treat the cards as plain memory storage, while downloading from a camera via cable means that it only gets treated like camera memory. I bought my late grandfather's printer, an HP all-in-one that scans and has a many-type card-reader.
--LAN3 Sun, 03 Jun 2007 19:04:27 -0400
Yeah! Printers w/ memory card readers still weird me out a tad. I guess I'm more prone to fiddling with photos digitally, and can't see a printer doing a good job with that, even if it has one of those small builtin screens.
--Kirk Sun, 03 Jun 2007 22:07:26 -0400
Well, in this case, a memory card with the printer (a USB printer) will show up as a removeable storage drive in XP-- it's not merely a card-to-printer dealie. Those that weird you out, I too find very unsatisfactory.
--LAN3 Sun, 03 Jun 2007 23:15:58 -0400
And nobody ever uses A: or B: as drive letters even now, do they?
Built-in card readers would be nice; I find I leave my camera plugged in and turned on, and end up draining my batteries.
--Nick B Mon, 04 Jun 2007 01:53:20 -0400
It'd be nice if the cameras with proprietary rechargeable batteries would go ahead and charge off the USB or at least draw power off it while they're connected.
--LAN3 Mon, 04 Jun 2007 05:18:23 -0400
Sometime i need to look into corrective action for Window's insane need to scan new media and try to figure out what to do with it.
Just open up a damn file folder and don't try to hold my hand, kthxbye.
--Kirk Mon, 04 Jun 2007 09:30:13 -0400