Sure, the Al Qaeda in Iraq sent the bombers. Does it matter that they were sent from IRaq and not Afghanistan? I would say that the invasion of Afghanistan destabilized the middle east, by forcing Al Qaeda to find new digs-- but that doesn't sit well with those who accept the invasion of Afghanistan as a reasonable response to the most recent attack on US soil.
--LAN3 Sun Nov 13 16:27:23 2005
I'd say the point is to be preventitive more than punitary...
and it seems like we would have had a pretty good shot at containing Afghanistan. Iraq was a much larger enterprise, and inherently more "leaky". I wasn't for the Afghanistan invasion at first but now it doesn't seem like taking out the government acting as their HQ was such a bad idea.
--Kirk Sun Nov 13 16:42:16 2005
It was never a bad idea. Frankly, it wasn't a bad idea before they attacked on 9/11, or the USS Cole, or the base in Saudi Arabia, or the WTC in 1993. And that's just the attacks against Americans.
--LAN3 Mon Nov 14 16:44:02 2005
This is a great site, cool...
Thanks for people who create thit site. More cool information, more articles. Great!!!
see my site :-)
--maxion Mon Nov 14 21:28:04 2005
Damn, another spammer.
Well, one lone spam ain't a big deal, we'll see what any friends look like and then start exterminatin'
--Kirk Tue Nov 15 10:14:58 2005
Comments Disabled... (Thanks Dirty Rotten Spammers)
Feel free to write kirkjerk at gmail dot com!