Framework complexity is tricky. If your system is massive enough that you spend 20% less time doing "the framework" than you would have doing the code that the framework replaces, then you're good. But as a project shrinks, it's harder to justify. Sure it's nice for, say, GWT to do a bunch of ajaxy things for you, but for the most part, you can probably hack up the same stuff with dojo and JSP in the same or less time, and forget the extra complexity.
struts sucks. tapestry sucks. gwt sucks. they all suck, so there, nyah.
But there is a tipping point, where you invest in some extra complexity at the beginning, take the hit, but then 2 months down the road myriad things are easier and more consistent because of it.
Also think about tool support. Java and JS have good code/debug support, Tapestry less so. How easy is your day-to-day work with the code.
--Mr. Ibis Wed Mar 28 15:57:48 2007
UoQRRz Read, of course, far from my topic. But still, we can work together. How do you feel about trust management?!....
--cheap oem software Sat Feb 11 14:00:52 2012
IKdhkL Im obliged for the post.Much thanks again. Much obliged.
--Discount OEM Software Wed Mar 7 12:39:42 2012
Comments Disabled... (Thanks Dirty Rotten Spammers)
Feel free to write kirkjerk at gmail dot com!