sidebar 2006.12.17
If we get to 2012 I think we'll be able to muddle through indefinitely.

--Kirk Sun Dec 17 20:30:57 2006
that's not an *uction, kirk...
--FoSO Sun Dec 17 20:54:20 2006
Oops. I meant, err, "deconstruction".

Or, maybe just suction.

--Kirk Mon Dec 18 03:22:04 2006
(and for the record I now know the other 10 or so possibilities thanks to the mightly power of grep...)
--Kirk Mon Dec 18 03:23:01 2006
Does the Induction part just contribute to global warming? =b
--The_Lex Mon Dec 18 15:01:01 2006
Actually, now that I think about it. . .other than as a thought experiment, this whole process would actually do more to contribute to global warming than not.

For people in NE to drive to the beach, do the process then drive home would put carbon in the air. . .all just for a process to prove a point.

Will it actually go about changing their habits?
--The_Lex Mon Dec 18 21:25:25 2006